
- Complete NestJS TypeScript implementation with WebSocket support - Direct messaging (DM) and group chat functionality - End-to-end encryption with AES encryption and key pairs - Media file support (images, videos, audio, documents) up to 100MB - Push notifications with Firebase Cloud Messaging integration - Mention alerts and real-time typing indicators - User authentication with JWT and Passport - SQLite database with TypeORM entities and relationships - Comprehensive API documentation with Swagger/OpenAPI - File upload handling with secure access control - Online/offline status tracking and presence management - Message editing, deletion, and reply functionality - Notification management with automatic cleanup - Health check endpoint for monitoring - CORS configuration for cross-origin requests - Environment-based configuration management - Structured for Flutter SDK integration Features implemented: ✅ Real-time messaging with Socket.IO ✅ User registration and authentication ✅ Direct messages and group chats ✅ Media file uploads and management ✅ End-to-end encryption ✅ Push notifications ✅ Mention alerts ✅ Typing indicators ✅ Message read receipts ✅ Online status tracking ✅ File access control ✅ Comprehensive API documentation Ready for Flutter SDK development and production deployment.
ansi-regex
Regular expression for matching ANSI escape codes
Install
$ npm install ansi-regex
Usage
const ansiRegex = require('ansi-regex');
ansiRegex().test('\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m');
//=> true
ansiRegex().test('cake');
//=> false
'\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m'.match(ansiRegex());
//=> ['\u001B[4m', '\u001B[0m']
'\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m'.match(ansiRegex({onlyFirst: true}));
//=> ['\u001B[4m']
'\u001B]8;;https://github.com\u0007click\u001B]8;;\u0007'.match(ansiRegex());
//=> ['\u001B]8;;https://github.com\u0007', '\u001B]8;;\u0007']
API
ansiRegex(options?)
Returns a regex for matching ANSI escape codes.
options
Type: object
onlyFirst
Type: boolean
Default: false
(Matches any ANSI escape codes in a string)
Match only the first ANSI escape.
FAQ
Why do you test for codes not in the ECMA 48 standard?
Some of the codes we run as a test are codes that we acquired finding various lists of non-standard or manufacturer specific codes. We test for both standard and non-standard codes, as most of them follow the same or similar format and can be safely matched in strings without the risk of removing actual string content. There are a few non-standard control codes that do not follow the traditional format (i.e. they end in numbers) thus forcing us to exclude them from the test because we cannot reliably match them.
On the historical side, those ECMA standards were established in the early 90's whereas the VT100, for example, was designed in the mid/late 70's. At that point in time, control codes were still pretty ungoverned and engineers used them for a multitude of things, namely to activate hardware ports that may have been proprietary. Somewhere else you see a similar 'anarchy' of codes is in the x86 architecture for processors; there are a ton of "interrupts" that can mean different things on certain brands of processors, most of which have been phased out.
Maintainers
Tidelift helps make open source sustainable for maintainers while giving companies
assurances about security, maintenance, and licensing for their dependencies.